Ngrok Alternatives for CI/CD Pipelines: How to Use Tunneling Solutions to Test Webhooks and APIs

In the world of modern software development, Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines are the automated heartbeats of progress. They build, test, and deploy code with relentless efficiency. But this automation introduces a unique challenge: how do you test components that rely on external communication, like webhooks from services like Stripe, GitHub, or Slack? These services need a public URL to send their payloads, but your CI runner is a temporary, firewalled environment hidden deep within a private network.

This is where tunneling solutions come in. For years, Ngrok has been the go-to tool for developers needing to expose a local server to the internet. It’s simple, effective, and has become almost synonymous with local webhook testing. However, as teams scale and CI/CD pipelines become more complex, relying solely on Ngrok might not be the optimal choice. Concerns over pricing for high-traffic automated use, security policies in enterprise environments, and the desire for more control or better integration lead many to seek out Ngrok alternatives.

This article dives deep into the world of tunneling solutions tailored for the demanding environment of CI/CD. We’ll explore why tunneling is indispensable for robust integration testing and break down the top Ngrok alternatives, complete with practical examples of how to integrate them into your automated workflows for testing webhooks and APIs.

---

Why Tunneling is Crucial for Modern CI/CD

Modern applications are rarely monolithic islands. They are interconnected ecosystems communicating through a web of APIs and event-driven webhooks. A user signing up might trigger a webhook to a marketing platform, a payment processed by Stripe sends a confirmation webhook, and a git push can trigger a whole chain of automated events via GitHub webhooks. To ensure your application functions correctly, you must test these interactions.

The CI/CD Visibility Problem

The core problem is one of access. Your CI environment, whether it’s a GitHub Actions runner, a Jenkins agent, or a GitLab runner, is designed to be isolated and secure. It can make outbound requests to the internet, but it cannot accept inbound connections. This means a third-party service like Twilio can’t send an SMS status update webhook to your application running its test suite inside the CI container.

How Tunneling Provides the Solution

A tunneling service acts as a secure bridge. You run a small client inside your CI environment that establishes a secure, outbound connection to the service’s public server. The service then provides a unique, public URL (e.g., https://random-name.example.com). Any traffic sent to this public URL is securely “tunneled” through the established connection and delivered to your application running on a local port (e.g., localhost:3000) inside the CI runner.

This simple yet powerful mechanism unlocks several key benefits for CI/CD pipelines:

• True End-to-End Testing: Instead of mocking webhook payloads, which can become outdated or miss edge cases, you can test your application with real, live data from the actual third-party service. This allows you to verify your entire stack, from receiving the request to processing the data and updating the database.
• Realistic Environment Simulation: You can accurately test how your application handles network latency, malformed payloads, or repeated deliveries—scenarios that are difficult to simulate reliably with mock data.
• Faster Feedback and Early Bug Detection: Integration bugs are notoriously tricky. By catching them automatically in the CI pipeline every time code is pushed, you prevent them from ever reaching staging or production environments. This drastically shortens the feedback loop and reduces the cost of fixing bugs.

---

What to Look For in an Ngrok Alternative for CI/CD

When choosing a tunneling tool specifically for an automated pipeline, the criteria are different from what a developer might prioritize for casual local debugging. Here’s what matters most.

Automation and CI/CD Integration

The tool must be “headless” and scriptable. Look for a robust Command-Line Interface (CLI) that allows you to start, stop, and manage tunnels programmatically. Official Docker images, GitHub Actions, or other pre-built CI integrations are a massive plus, as they reduce setup friction. The ability to easily extract the generated public URL and pass it to subsequent steps in your script is non-negotiable.

Security and Control

Security is paramount. In a CI/CD context, you’re opening a temporary door into your private build environment. The ideal solution should offer:

• TLS Encryption: All traffic from the public endpoint to your local application should be encrypted.
• Authentication: The ability to protect your public endpoint with Basic Auth, OAuth, or other authentication mechanisms to prevent unauthorized access.
• IP Whitelisting: The option to restrict access to the tunnel to a specific set of IP addresses (e.g., only allow requests from GitHub’s webhook servers).
• Self-Hosting: For maximum security and control, some teams prefer a self-hosted solution that runs entirely within their own infrastructure.

Performance and Reliability

Your integration tests are only as reliable as the tunnel they depend on. A flaky tunneling service will lead to intermittently failing builds, eroding trust in your test suite. Look for a service with a reputation for high uptime and low latency. A globally distributed network can help ensure that requests from third-party services are routed efficiently, regardless of their origin.

Scalability and Pricing

CI pipelines can run frequently, potentially creating hundreds or thousands of tunnels per day across a large organization. The pricing model must align with this automated, ephemeral usage. Models based on bandwidth consumption or active connections can become expensive quickly. Look for generous free tiers, flat-rate plans, or per-seat pricing that is predictable and budget-friendly for automated systems.

Observability and Debugging

When a test fails, you need to know why. A good tunneling tool provides an inspection interface that lets you view the headers and bodies of requests and responses that passed through the tunnel. The ability to replay a request is an invaluable debugging feature.

---

Top Ngrok Alternatives for CI/CD Pipelines

With these criteria in mind, let’s explore some of the best Ngrok alternatives on the market, each with its unique strengths for CI/CD automation.

1. Cloudflare Tunnel

Cloudflare Tunnel (part of its Zero Trust platform) is a powerhouse solution that leverages Cloudflare’s massive global network for security and performance. It’s built for enterprise-grade security and reliability.

• Key Features for CI/CD: The cloudflared CLI is robust and easy to automate. It provides incredibly secure tunnels by default, integrating seamlessly with Cloudflare Access for authentication. The free tier is exceptionally generous, with no hard limits on tunnels or bandwidth.

• How to Use it in a CI/CD Pipeline (GitHub Actions Example): The cloudflared client can generate a temporary public URL without any prior login or account setup, making it perfect for ephemeral CI environments.

  name: CI Pipeline with Cloudflare Tunnel
  
  
  jobs:
    test:
      runs-on: ubuntu-latest
      steps:
        - name: Checkout code
          uses: actions/checkout@v3
  
  
        - name: Start Application
          run: npm start & # Start your app in the background
  
  
        - name: Start Cloudflare Tunnel
          run: |
            curl -L https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflared/releases/latest/download/cloudflared-linux-amd64 -o cloudflared
            chmod +x cloudflared
            # Start the tunnel and send its output to a log file in the background
            ./cloudflared tunnel --url http://localhost:3000 > tunnel.log 2>&1 &
            sleep 5 # Give tunnel time to establish the connection
            # Extract the public URL from the log and expose it as an environment variable for other steps
            TUNNEL_URL=$(grep -o 'https://.*\.trycloudflare.com' tunnel.log | head -n 1)
            echo "TUNNEL_URL=$TUNNEL_URL" >> $GITHUB_ENV
  
  
        - name: Run Integration Tests
          run: |
            echo "Testing with webhook URL: ${{ env.TUNNEL_URL }}"
            # Your test script would use this environment variable to configure a third-party service
            npm test -- --webhook-url=${{ env.TUNNEL_URL }}
  

  • Pros:

    • Extremely Secure: Leverages Cloudflare’s best-in-class security features.
    • Highly Reliable: Backed by a massive, resilient global network.
    • Generous Free Tier: Perfect for heavy CI/CD usage without worrying about costs.

  • Cons:

    • Setup can be more involved if you want to use permanent hostnames or advanced features, which require a Cloudflare account.

  • Best For: Teams and organizations that prioritize security, reliability, and scalability, especially those already invested in the Cloudflare ecosystem.

    2. zrok

    zrok is a powerful, open-source, and self-hostable tunneling solution. It provides the flexibility of Ngrok but with the added control of running the service within your own infrastructure.

  • Key Features for CI/CD: As an open-source tool, zrok offers ultimate control. You can “share” resources privately (within your own zrok network) or publicly. Its CLI is designed for easy scripting. The self-hosting option means you control the security, data privacy, and performance entirely.

  • How to Use it in a CI/CD Pipeline (Shell Script Example): Assuming you have a self-hosted zrok instance, the CI runner would need to be “enabled” to access it.

    #!/bin/bash
    # Enable the zrok environment in the CI runner (secret token managed by CI)
    zrok enable $ZROK_SECRET_TOKEN
    # Start the application in the background
    ./my-app &
    APP_PID=$!
    # Create a public share and capture the frontend URL
    TUNNEL_URL=$(zrok share public http://localhost:8080 --backend-mode proxy)
    # Export for test runner
    export WEBHOOK_URL=$TUNNEL_URL
    # Run tests
    npm run integration-tests
    # Cleanup: disable zrok environment and stop the app
    zrok disable
    kill $APP_PID
    

• Pros:

  • Full Control: Self-hosting gives you complete authority over your tunneling infrastructure.
  • Open Source: Transparent, extensible, and free from vendor lock-in.
  • Flexible Sharing: Offers both public and private sharing options.

• Cons:

  • Requires you to manage and maintain the server infrastructure, adding operational overhead.
  • Public SaaS offering is available but newer than some competitors.

• Best For: Security-conscious organizations, teams with strict data residency requirements, or anyone who prefers the control and flexibility of open-source, self-hosted tools.

---

3. localhost.run

localhost.run stands out for its incredible simplicity. It requires no client installation or sign-up, using a standard SSH client, which is available in virtually every CI environment.

• Key Features for CI/CD: The biggest advantage is the zero-installation requirement. You can create a tunnel with a single SSH command. This makes it one of the easiest and fastest solutions to get running in a CI script.

• How to Use it in a CI/CD Pipeline (GitHub Actions Example):

  ”`yaml

  • name: Start Tunnel with localhost.run run: |

    Start the tunnel in the background, forwarding to local port 8000

    The output containing the URL is captured to a file

    ssh -R 80:localhost:8000 ssh.localhost.run > tunnel_info.log 2>&1 & sleep 5 # Give it time to connect

    Extract the URL. The URL is typically the last word in the log.

    TUNNEL_URL=$(cat tunnel_info.log | tail -n 1 | awk ‘{print $NF}’) echo “TUNNEL_URL=$TUNNEL_URL” >> $GITHUB_ENV

  • name: Run Tests with Tunnel run: | echo “Tunnel is live at: ${{ env.TUNNEL_URL }}”

    Run tests using the URL

    pytest –webhook-url=${{ env.TUNNEL_URL }}

    * **Pros:**
    * **Extremely Simple:** No client to download or install.
    * **Fast Setup:** A single command gets you a public URL.
    * **Free:** The service is free to use.
    * **Cons:**
    * Less feature-rich than other solutions (e.g., no built-in request inspector UI).
    * Relies on a third-party service whose long-term reliability and performance might be less guaranteed than a major provider like Cloudflare.
    * **Best For:** Quick setups, smaller projects, or situations where you cannot install custom software in the build environment and need a dead-simple, no-frills solution.
    -----
    ### 4\. Expose
    **Expose**, created by BeyondCode, is a popular open-source tunneling solution within the PHP and Laravel community, but it's built to work with any language or framework. It offers a polished developer experience with a local dashboard for inspecting traffic.
    * **Key Features for CI/CD:** Expose can be self-hosted for full control or used via its official paid service. The client is a single PHP binary that is easy to install and script. Its standout feature is the clean and intuitive dashboard for inspecting requests, which can be invaluable for debugging failed CI tests.
    * **How to Use it in a CI/CD Pipeline (Shell Script Example):**
    ```bash
    # Install the Expose client
    composer global require beyondcode/expose
    # Add composer's bin directory to the path
    export PATH="$PATH:$HOME/.composer/vendor/bin"
    # Start the tunnel in the background. --json flag outputs details as JSON
    # This makes it easy to parse the URL reliably
    expose share http://localhost:5000 --json > expose_output.json &
    sleep 5
    # Parse the URL using a tool like jq
    TUNNEL_URL=$(jq -r '.url' expose_output.json)
    export WEBHOOK_URL=$TUNNEL_URL
    # Run tests
    go test ./...
    # Cleanup
    pkill expose
    

• Pros:

  • Excellent Debugging UI: The request inspection dashboard is top-notch.
  • Open Source and Self-Hostable: Offers great flexibility.
  • Developer-Friendly: Designed with a focus on a smooth user experience.

• Cons:

  • Relies on PHP and Composer for installation, which might add an extra dependency to your CI environment if you’re not already using them.

• Best For: Teams that highly value a good debugging and request inspection experience. It’s a natural fit for PHP projects but works perfectly well for any tech stack.

---

Comparison at a Glance

Feature	Ngrok (Free Plan)	Cloudflare Tunnel	zrok	localhost.run	Expose (Self-hosted)
Setup Ease	Very Easy	Easy (for temp URLs)	Moderate (self-hosted)	Extremely Easy	Easy
CI/CD Automation	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent
Security	Good	Enterprise-Grade	Excellent (self-hosted)	Basic (HTTPS)	Excellent (self-hosted)
Self-Hosting	No	No	Yes	No	Yes
Pricing Model	Limited (sessions, bandwidth)	Generous Free Tier	Free (BYO Infrastructure)	Free	Free (BYO Infrastructure)
Request Inspection	Yes (Local UI)	No (uses Cloudflare logs)	Yes (via zrok admin)	No	Yes (Local UI)

---

Conclusion: Choosing the Right Tunnel for Your Pipeline

Ngrok rightfully earned its place as a developer’s favorite tool, but the CI/CD landscape demands more. The need for enhanced security, predictable costs at scale, and tighter integration with infrastructure has fueled the growth of powerful Ngrok alternatives.

The right choice depends entirely on your team’s priorities:

• For unmatched security and reliability backed by a global network, Cloudflare Tunnel is the clear winner.
• For ultimate control and data privacy, a self-hosted solution like zrok or Expose is the ideal path.
• For maximum simplicity and speed in environments where you can’t install software, localhost.run is a brilliant, hassle-free option.

By moving beyond mocks and embracing live webhook testing, you make your CI/CD pipeline smarter, more robust, and far more effective at catching critical integration bugs before they impact your users. Evaluate your pipeline’s needs, pick the tunneling solution that fits your workflow, and elevate your automated testing strategy today.